What will it take to convince you to get the Covid Vaccine?

 Why doesn't everyone get vaccinated? This may be a philosophical question even though it is really a scientific question. Right now about half the country is vaccinated and the government is essentially begging people to vaccinate. Simultaneously, infection rates are dropping, mortality rates are dropping, and restrictions are being lifted. So, is it even necessary to get vaccinated to Covid or really any other infection? 

We need to understand the answer to this question for several reasons. First, and foremost is that I believe this Covid-19 virus is a signal of the world to come. For most of human history our population has gone through frequent and regular losses of huge numbers due to bacteria and viruses. The middle ages were fraught with repeat visits of the Bubonic plague often times wiping out 30% or more of the population. Small pox has a mortality rate of 30-50% in immune ignorant populations and wiped out large swaths of indigenous people throughout the world with European expansion. Logically, we are due for viruses and bacteria to resume their pace of population control.

We have lived in a golden era that began in the 1930's. Medicine in the 20th century effectively stopped the scourge of these diseases with a combination of vaccines and antibiotics. Virtually no one born after 1960 in the United States knows of the terror of a deadly contagious disease. AIDS/HIV was the closest thing to a deadly pandemic but due to it's predilection for a specific segment of society it did not and still does not create the wide population terror of seeing children dying or paralyzed like we did with polio. I suspect our lack of exposure to these terrifying diseases has enabled a large number of people to errantly feel that they are safe from disease.

This period of health in our lives may be lulling us in to a state of unpreparedness. The Covid pandemic awakened that fear in some of us but it also led to government lock downs that incited anger and even violence. We now have people who decline vaccination not because they are fearful of side effects but more to make a statement that government cannot tell them what to do. I have many friends who have this feeling and they try to justify it but calling the vaccine unsafe.  

What about this danger of vaccination? The CDC recently published that there have been about 4500 deaths following the Covid vaccination. Could this be true? I looked up the CDC website and given how poorly they have managed this pandemic I was unsurprised by how poorly they presented this data. They stated that indeed about 4,500 people have died who have been vaccinated out of about 275 million vaccines administered, but they have only found about 7 deaths they can associate with the vaccine. They don't make this very clear and they don't explain how long they track people after vaccination and they don't state clearly the fact that they are recording deaths of any cause. For example, if you die in a car accident on the way home from the vaccine you are probably recorded as a death. This poor communication strategy reminds me of how people who were  90 years old with stage IV cancer who died with a positive Covid test were recorded as dying of Covid. I guess these guys never learn. But, the take home message is that less than 10 people have died directly from the vaccine, making this probably the safest medical treatment in human history. 

I have asked patients and friends who do not plan to be vaccinated why they are declining this treatment. Most just don't want to do it. They don't think it is necessary and some either don't believe the infection is real or feel they may have already had the infection, or don't believe the risk of dying is significant enough. But, we don't do vaccines or medical treatment only to prevent death. We also desire a high quality of life and if we can maintain that with a relatively simple treatment that has virtually no downside aside from a day or two of discomfort it seems like a relatively easy choice. For example, Covid can cause a permanent change in smell, most people recover but there have been  a large number who haven't just lost their sense of smell but now have a smell disorder where everything smells like garbage. I would think that the quality of life would be impacted when sitting down to sip that glass of cabernet and readying to bite into that medium rare filet mignon and all you smell is the local dump. Do you think this might impact how you feel about life? Preventing that might just be worth it. How about the large number of people who a year after infection still can't play sports, concentrate at work or climb a flight of stairs without exhaustion?

I appreciate that state, federal and local governments are trying to create incentives to get people to vaccinate but have they done any actual outreach to the anti-vaxers to see what would motivate them? I have my doubts that a lottery or a free beer is going to impact this group. It may get people who plan to vaccinate anyways to move a little faster. 

The reason this problem is pressing is that the next virus might be a lot more dangerous than this one and we need to be ready. We need to figure out now how to handle this better. Was there a better way to close the country? Could we have done preventive moves better with less economic trauma? Can we learn how to not only develop an incredibly effective vaccine in record time but convince our country that it is our patriotic duty to protect ourselves and others?

This virus was just a warm up, a warning of the future, and we need to be better prepared to fight this better with more cohesion because if we don't the future we have will not be the future we want. Imagine instead of a virus that kills 1% we have an infection that kills 20-30%. Would our economy survive? Would we have a complete societal breakdown? A 4 day disruption in oil flow nearly crippled the Eastern United States, what happens when no one is left to run the electricity? Keep the stores stocked? And in the meantime, consider whether it is your patriotic duty to be vaccinated.

How Covid-19 is Similar to a Wildfire

 

Many of you know that I live on the coast of Central California which has been hit particularly hard with wildfires this summer. I thank all of you who have called or messaged me to check in. Fortunately, we were about 5 miles from these devastating fires and mostly we have just had to deal with smoke and some very surreal sunsets. I have several friends and patients who have lost homes and my heart goes out to them and their families. Wildfires are terrifying and unpredictable, at least in the beginning and then they become predictably unpredictable.

This fire started with a strange set of extremely hot and dry days. Rarely do we have temperatures in my area above 80 degrees but prior to these fires we had several days in the high 90's to low 100's, and then we had a lightning storm. Growing up in the Midwest summer lightning is common but in California it is rare and this lightning had no rain. Just these massive bolts of energy striking every few seconds for five hours. I have never before seen lightning bolts this thick, they looked like they came from an alien invasion horror movie. I could see them striking the ground across the Monterey Bay and over the mountains going towards San Jose. With each one I waited praying no fire would start but knowing that this was going to be a horrible night. By the end of the storm there was a record of thousands of lightning strikes and something like 80 fires were triggered. Our fire officials were rapidly overwhelmed by the number and intensity of the fires. Our area has not had a major fire in over 100 years which meant that due to very zealous management of small fires we had a lot of dense foliage and old dry leaves some 4 feet deep waiting to burn.

Initially, the response was just to save lives, there was no effort to contain the fires just to evacuate people. I have heard stories of people driving through intense heat to escape, I know of people who died trying and I also know of people who stayed behind and successfully fought these fires and saved their homes and their neighbors home. As people were moved out of harms way the firefighters dug lines to keep the fires from spreading. They did an amazing job, the fire was initially moving so quickly over 80,000 homes were threatened but quickly that number shrank. But, nature also helped us, I was informed by a local sheriff that the initial fire took advantage of the fuel but once it climbed to the ridge tops it stopped moving. As the fire has run out of fuel and with hard work by our fire fighters the tide turned positive. In the end we lost just over 900 homes in our very small county of 275,000 people. The fire right now is just over 80% contained but will likely burn for over a year.

Our fire has been one of a huge number striking the Western United States, we have been having new fires on almost a daily basis in our region, some started by lightning others by campers and one because of a pyrotechnic baby reveal party. What we have in the Western United States is the perfect combination of forests that have not had natural fires in decades due to fire suppression, hot dry weather and people who have built homes in these beautiful areas. There really isn't a surprise that we are having bigger and nastier fire seasons and whether you believe global warming is valid or not we have had a sequence of warm and dry years.

So, what does this have to do with Covid-19? When I observe the progress of this disease I see something that seems to parallel the way a wildfire behaves, and I also see that our virus fighting and firefighting techniques have unique similarities. My observation of the virus is that it began like a wildfire in China, containment failed and embers spread through Europe and then the United States. But, this didn't spread out in a uniform pattern, like a fire it was opportunistic striking specific populations. The response to contain the "fire" was successful with shutting down society but there was a constant low grade fire, kind of beneath the radar. Ask any firefighter and he will talk about ash pits that stay hot for months and trees that burn beneath the bark for weeks, months, and sometimes over a year. That is why even though large areas of the world stopped having people socialize and interact there was still a constant and persistent presence of the virus. Like a fire it continued to have a slow low grade presence with little embers popping up in different places.

In the early days of the pandemic California congratulated itself on doing a great job with an early statewide shutdown. But, as I have mentioned in earlier posts the virus probably arrived in California in December or earlier starting slowly in low risk groups diagnosed as a bad flu. The shut down slowed the momentum but there was always a slow burn of cases waiting to flare up. As soon as restrictions were lifted, like a fire the virus spread aggressively in vulnerable populations of high density people with  poor health. Those areas are like vulnerable forests that have years of undergrowth ready to burst into flames. We can call the virus bigoted as it has selectively attacked black and brown people, but the real culprit is low income, dense housing, poor health and diet, obesity, and poor pulmonary function. Every physician knows that these issues are common in the inner city poor. And, of course, minorities are over represented in these communities. This was the kindling waiting to burn.

Like a wildfire, New York City flared early and spread far, poor decision making failed to protect vulnerable populations particularly elderly in nursing homes and the virus took advantage. Ironically, as the virus calmed down officials took credit for what naturally happens in a wildfire as it runs out of fuel, the cases declined. But, the case numbers won't decline to zero no matter how much one suppresses activity. Unless, the government is going to behave like they do in China and round up people who leave their home to go for a walk, there will always be some level of social interaction and therefore the virus will have an opportunity to sustain itself. And like a fire if the virus is able to to smolder eventually there will be fresh kindling to burn. 

Normally, with a virus pandemic we behave similar to first responders in a wildfire. We try to get people out of harms way by isolating the virus. If the virus breaks through those barriers we do our best to protect vulnerable populations and we try to establish the equivalent of fire breaks by limiting travel outside of the community affected. This is not normally a political issue. As we identify ways to slow the spread we try to get people to engage in safe behavior. We usually fail if we ask people to do too much. We need buy in. Wear a mask, distance socially, reduce your groups of people you interact with. 

For example, in the 1980's HIV was spreading rapidly among people who were engaging in unprotected sex with large numbers of partners. You may recall the initial response by the government led by health advisors was abstinence, but that was an absurd proposition. Young people, who were the primary transmitters of disease, tended to engage in high risk behavior. But, once the gay community took on the problem and promoted "safe sex" the problem started to come under control. Likewise, telling teenagers they cannot congregate is unlikely to work, once you shut down the places they can go to like beaches and campgrounds and schools they start to congregate in homes without parental supervision. The predictable result is exactly what we have seen, a rapid rise in infections among people under the age of 40. The next step is to then go home and share that virus with mom, dad, grandma and grandpa. Kind of like having a campfire in a forest that hasn't burned in a hundred years. 

How do we protect homes from fires? We ask people to reduce fuels around their homes for a periphery of 100 feet. We don't ask them to tear down their house and rebuild it made of cement. We don't force them to leave, and remarkably those homes that cleared brush and trees mostly survived these fires. So, where has been the effort to reduce the fuels that feed a virus? I have only seen global responses, close everything, stay in your home and don't go out. Are we surprised that this doesn't work?  Not everyone can tolerate this. How about focusing our energy on people who have underlying health issues and elevated age? Protect them, provide financial support, and try to reduce the fuel that feeds the virus fire.  Kind of like going into forests and clearing brush, creating fire breaks and access roaads. And then, when a vaccine comes out encourage people to get it and focus on those in high risk professions or with high risk health issues. You know the saying "an ounce of prevention..."

Nature has a lot to teach us, maybe it's time we listen.

Cancer Can't Wait For A Vaccine

During the past week I have diagnosed 2 patients with cancer. Sometimes I feel like these diagnoses come in waves, I may not see a new cancer patient for weeks or even months and all of the sudden 2 walk in my door within a few days. But, as I ponder this I wonder about how close they came to having a missed or delayed diagnosis, for we are in very strange times. 

When the virus started spreading throughout our country in early March the medical community had a very rapid visceral reaction of fear. In my specialty, ear nose and throat, the fear was particularly felt as many of the physicians who died in China were ENT doctors infected while treating sick patients. At that time, before the shelter in place orders, the Stanford department of ENT published a case report from China of a sinus surgery resulting in every person in the room infected. Shortly after this, reports from China and Hong Kong identified viral rna stands suspended in the air for up to 3 hours in patient rooms. 

My speciality is to this day stumped as to how and whether we should be treating patients. There is the personal concern that doctors will be exposed unnecessarily and the treatment concern that a patient might be infected by entering a room previously occupied by a positive asymptomatic patient. Many of you are aware of the closures in March and April of medical offices. In addition, many physicians modified their treatment and exam regimens withholding certain procedures they felt might cause added risk to themselves, their staff, or patients. 

I recall discussing this with my wife, Cynthia. Should I stop seeing patients, or maybe only do telemedicine like many of my colleagues? If I would see patients should I change what I do? I remembering looking at Cynthia and saying that I can't provide what I feel is substandard care and I fear that all of these doctors staying home is going to result in severe disease such as cancer either being delayed or missed. 

I made the conscious decision to continue practicing, yes, I put on the N95 mask, spaced out patients, increased cleansing of the office and the exam rooms, screened patients for symptoms. But, I also made the decision to take on the added risk of seeing people and giving them the best care I could. I argued with my partners over this. The prevailing opinion locally and nationally was to only see emergencies in the office. 

But what is an emergency? I argued that a senior citizen sheltering in their home with no ability to leave, reliant on their hearing for telephone calls and news broadcasts, with hearing loss due to wax in their ears or a broken hearing aid constituted an emergency just as important as a nose bleed, severe pain, or tonsillitis. I also argued that how can I or my staff really know what an emergency is, that has to be determined by the patient. 

My arguments were accepted and we never closed the office. We offered and even encouraged telemedicine but we kept the doors open. I know for a fact that we were more available to our community than any other ENT practice in the Bay area. I know this because a patient from San Jose called 20 other medical practices before she found me to take care of her ear infection. 

So earlier today I was thinking about the 16 year old boy who had a bad respiratory and tonsil infection in January. He developed swollen lymph nodes and they never went down. I don't know what exactly happened between then and early April but by the time I saw him in the office he looked like he was growing a grapefruit on his neck. I did my standard work up and placed a needle in the swollen glands to remove fluid and sent it off.  Unfortunately, the pathologist was unable to make a diagnosis. Fortunately, my determination to keep the office open was the same determination to keep my surgery center open, which I administer. I got him in the OR within a week and sent a biopsy off to the lab. The pathology was delayed and then had to be sent to Stanford but now we have the diagnosis of Hodgkin' s lymphoma and I can direct him to treatment. 

A second gentleman came in to see me about 10 days ago. He had a swollen gland on his neck for the past 6 weeks. He felt guilty about coming in, nervous about Covid-19, and didn't want to take up my time. Once again I followed my standard routine, I wasn't going to allow this virus to impede good care. Another needle biopsy, this time positive for a metastatic cancer, I plan to take him to the OR next week to do biopsies looking for a source. I already have an oncologist ready to see him. 

As I was talking to Cynthia tonight I realized that if I didn't demand of myself to provide the right care, if I reduced my exposure by closing the office or modified my treatment algorithm or screened for only "emergencies" like the vast majority of my colleagues have for the past 10 weeks, in all likelihood these two men would not be on their way to treatment. 

This is not an attempt to pat myself on the back. No, I am ashamed by how the medical community including the health officers in our community and our country have handled this crisis. Frankly, they should be ashamed of themselves. Cancer isn't going to wait for a vaccine. People still have health problems and a lot don't look like emergencies. In fact, most emergencies start as little problems that are pretty easy to manage. But, when we collectively forget our duty and our oath we turn those little problems into major ones. 

I remember vividly, going to medical school in the 80's during the AID's crisis. We had poor testing, no treatment and 100% mortality. At first we thought it was easy to catch from respiratory droplets. Healthcare workers were terrified and many left the profession. I had family and friends encourage me to choose a different path. But, in medicine, you don't really choose the path, the path chooses you. And I accepted the risks. And the risks weren't limited to AID's, there was hepatitis, TB, and a myriad of other infectious diseases that physicians have risked exposure to since before the time of Galen. We accept that risk and society has rewarded us with respect and a very comfortable lifestyle. 

So, I am stumped, what has happened to my profession? Where did all this fear come from? And what happened to science? We have taken individual case reports and completely modified the entire structure of our profession. We have abdicated our role as the expert, we have allowed politicians to tell us what to do and how to do it. And the result inevitably will be bad medicine. Patients will have delayed care, poorer outcomes and minor issues will become major issues, because cancer can't wait for a vaccine. 

Covid Dreams

I'm willing to bet I'm not the only person who's dreams have been hijacked. I don't believe I have had a night of restful innocent sleep in over 2 months, my dreamland constantly recycles the loss of freedom in this new era with ever more stranger dream images. I'm sure we could all combine our dreams into some dystopian dream movie.

As I was talking about my endless restless nights with my wife,  Cynthia, I began to wonder about previous generations. I'm sure that we are not the first to have our blissful sleep disrupted. I even recall several weeks of nightmares after 911. But, I bet my disrupted sleep doesn't compare to when my grandparents woke up on December 7, 1941 to find that Pearl Harbor had been attacked. The life disruption of sending children off to war, nightly black out curtains, rationed food and fuel, must have created intense material for the dream world. The loss of freedom and complete life disruption lasted over 4 years and I imagine many people didn't have restful sleep for years.

I then thought about people who were taken from their homes, loaded in cattle cars, giving up all of their possessions to be transferred to concentration camps. I wonder if their minds could ever comprehend the losses they endured. Did their minds ever relax? Or was the night time just as terrifying as the day?

I completely understand the incredible good fortune of my life, I was raised in a stable, warm, loving household, I have pursued my dream career, I am surrounded by a wonderful spouse and children. I have a beautiful home and good friends. In many ways I am ashamed of this subconscious mind presenting these nightly terrors. I have dealt with greater challenges in my life. During my residency I worked 100 hour or more weeks, cracking chests, doing CPR, placing lines, repairing wounds, in battlefield conditions in inner city Detroit in the midst of the crack cocaine wars and the AID's crisis. This hardly compares, yet nightly my mind returns to it's own battles.

I hope this insanity ends soon, but I fear this is only the beginning of a marathon. I write this hoping for my mind to settle down but more to share with those who read this. If you are having Covid dreams you're not alone and hopefully sweet dreams are nearby.

End of the beginning or Beginning of the end?

 We are now nearly 6 months after someone in China somehow contracted and shared the Covid-19 virus. We have watched as each country has fallen like a domino to this invisible force. Nearly every country has gone through the same stages. Denial that the virus would have much impact, followed by a rapid run-up in cases and a state of uniform fear with progressive reductions in liberty as health systems are strained, followed by anger and depression about the financial toll, and now an attempt to try to return to some degree of normalcy.

What does this mean for the future? Unfortunately, my magic 8 ball tells me the future is uncertain. But, I am going to make a few predictions. I expect within 4 weeks there will be a bump in positive cases. We will see an increase in ER visits but a drop in deaths. By 4 weeks from now we will have at least 1 recommended therapy for treatment and ventilators will not be used very much. I predict that in 6 weeks some states will reverse openings and others will not, creating a confusing array of responses.

I think the public will fight against tightening again and businesses will fight to stay open. I also predict that the rate of infection will begin to fizzle out by the end of July as the number of people already exposed will be large enough to slow the spread. In September we will have a vaccine available to healthcare workers and by December it will be recommended for everyone.

By late fall we will begin to learn that the mortality rate from this virus is .01-.05% of people exposed. The final US mortality rate will reflect this as 30% or 130,000,000 people are infected by the end of the year with a total of 200,000 deaths. I also predict that when the entire number of people who die in this country regardless of cause, which has averaged about 3,000,000 a year the past few years, the number will only have increased by about 50,000 total or statistically insignificant.

Where's My Miracle Drug?

For my entire career and training I have always wanted to do what is best for my patients, I am willing to try new techniques or medications sometimes based on absolute scientific information but usually there is a component of hope and guesswork. There is always great controversy in medicine whether a medication or treatment actually works. I am usually trying to walk that fine line and that is where I believe the art of medicine is practiced.

The recent controversy of treatment for Covid 19 with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin is a perfect example of art versus fact versus fiction. Many of you have heard the President talk about his hope in these medications while at the same time the doctors around him are skeptical and cautious. This interplay happens nearly all the time in medicine. Anecdotal reports are viewed skeptically, scientists require hard science to be supported but anecdotes can be very useful in practicing the art. In addition,  patient pressure can result in improper treatment and can have bad consequences. I have seen both aspects many times and I would like to share with you some of these as well as my own recent anecdotal experience with treatment for Covid-19.

When I was in my residency in downtown Detroit I moonlighted in a local urgent care. A patient came in with an obvious viral upper respiratory infection and requested antibiotics. This same situation plays out millions of times a year. In some countries antibiotics are over the counter and don't require a prescription and are improperly used. I declined the request after explaining to the patient antibiotics don't cure viral infections (This was before Tamiflu and other antivirals). I counseled the patient to wait 7 to 10 days and if the sinus symptoms worsened that would be the time to consider antibiotics. A week later I was called in to the medical directors office. He told me the patient complained and he wanted to know why I didn't prescribe the patient antibiotics. I explained my reasoning and his response was "You should give the patient what they want, that is what they come here for. " I replied that I was going to practice medicine the way I was trained and if he did not want me to follow the standard of care I was willing to resign from his clinic. He decided to have me stay. Unfortunately, his approach to medical care along with many of my colleagues throughout the world has resulted in high rates of antibiotic resistant bacteria. To this day I see patients treated with oral antibiotics repeatedly for allergy symptoms and muscle aches and pains that have been incorrectly diagnosed as infections.

A different story occurred many years ago. During residency we were treating a patient for vertigo, at that time patients were often admitted to the hospital for medication. A new study was published about a treatment using a maneuver to roll the patient that could cure the most common version of vertigo, BPPV. We had a patient we consulted in the hospital that would have been a good candidate. My faculty thought the treatment was absurd and refused to give the treatment a try.  Instead the patient stayed 3 days in the hospital on medication. I waited until I was in practice on my own before I was able to give the Epley maneuver a try and I was very successful. No more hospitalizations for that problem!

I have my own anecdotal treatment. I have seen patients for many years for allergies and I have seen many patients with migraine headaches. Migraine sufferers are usually pretty miserable. About 15 years ago a patient was seen for chronic allergies who also was having migraines twice a week. Her migraine meds only gave modest relief. In addition, her allergy meds barely helped her allergies. We did a workup and she tested positive to grasses, weeds, trees, mold and dust so I placed her on allergy shots. At her 3 month follow up she was starting to notice improvement in her allergies but the remarkable thing was that she was only having a couple of migraines a month. There isn't any great data to show that allergy shots help migraines but it certainly was intriguing. A few months later I saw a patient who's paperwork indicated she had migraines, she was seeing me for something completely unrelated to allergies or migraines. She reported twice weekly migraines while on migraine medicine. I offered to allergy test her even though she swore she didn't have allergies. She tested positive to everything and I put her on allergy shots, last time I saw her she hadn't had a migraine in over a year.

This last story happened recently. A family member texted me she had a horrible sore throat and laryngitis but no shortness of breath, cough or muscle pain. She did have a fever for 1 night. She was in a rural vacation area and couldn't get tested for Covid-19.  She was doing well with sheltering in home but was a guest where she was staying. There was a visitor who was feeling fine but had been exposed to someone that had been recently treated for Covid-19. I decided to prescribe azithromycin since it has been used for Covid-19 and works for Strep. She did ok for a day but then texted me she was having shortness of breath. So, now I was faced with a decision whether to treat a problem that I did not have a positive test for and with medication that is currently a national controversy. I was extremely worried, the woman was young but in a rural location and I decided to prescribe hydroxychloroquine. I was worried about impacting the supply for rheumatoid arthritis patients but when I looked up the dosing she would only need 6 pills. I sent in the medication, warned her of the risk of a cardiac arrhythmia, and made several prayers. Within 24 hours all of her symptoms were improving and by the second day of treatment she felt completely cured.

This is the story of anecdotal medicine. Did my family member have Covid-19? Did the medication make a difference? I obviously used the medication for off label use which is allowed, despite some of the incorrect statements to the contrary. If Dr. Fauci's family member was ill would he do this? If you were my patient how would you want me to treat you?

In the ideal world we wait for double blind placebo controlled studies to prove the efficacy of treatment. Those studies usually take years. What should we do in a pandemic? I don't have the global answer to this, I guess I just have to keep practicing the art.

A Different Quarantine

I bet you're sitting in your house right now. Debating whether going out is both safe and appropriate. Maybe you're saving yourself until you need to stock up on food or deodorant. Maybe your hair is starting to show more gray at the roots. You're probably as stir crazy your kids.

How many times have you thought I'm healthy, strong, the flu hardly ever hits me? Why am I stuck at home? And then you think, I'm doing this for that senior couple two doors down, or maybe the family with the child who is disabled and vulnerable, or maybe the friend who's on chemo for her cancer.

But, them you look out the window and there goes seven or eight teenagers, boys and girls, aiming for the path in the forest, all within inches, giggling, bumping, swatting each other. The first thought, I bet, is those kids are not socially distancing, second thought, their parents will be so pissed if they all get sick, probably serves them right. Maybe your next thought is China and Singapore know how to do this. Those kids would be in deep s#$t there.

Well I believe you might be thinking wrong. Maybe these kids kind of have the right idea. Albeit, they're kids so they don't have it completely right. But they walk like they own the world and no badness can befall them. They are partly correct. This virus doesn't really harm most of them. This virus has a predilection for the old, the infirm.

So, "What's the point Dan?" you ask. The point is we are using the blunted weapon to fight this virus. We're going to use a 16 penny nail to hold this soap bubble to the wall. Well, how well is that going to work. My point is, we created a global stay at home order. Everyone, all ages needs to follow the very simple rules, Don't leave home except for absolutely essential reasons. You can go out for food, doctor visits, gasoline, a visit to the hardware store but beware if you want a hair cut, a new shirt, maybe a car wash, you better not or you'll get Corona and infect us all.

Is it just me or is there something wrong here? You can be 80 and go to the store to buy milk but if your 18 beware of a walk with your friends. I am probably a fool but I just don't see how this works. Sure, right now we isolate the virus maby five percent of us gets the virus, fifteen million, one percent of those die, one hundred fifty thousand. But, the virus isn't gone and we are nowhere close to the ninety-five percent herd immunity. So what's your reading list for November when this thing takes a second swing at us?

The real answer is to shoot for about the same mortality risk, one hundred fifty thousand, but a much higher rate of exposure to the population so when those elderly or frail individuals leave their homes they're safe. The only way to achieve this is smart quarantining. We aggressively isolate the high risk groups. We put our vast government resources into bringing food and healthcare to them. We have our younger healthy population out interacting, getting the corona virus and going nowhere near the vulnerable population. Society kind of moves forward.

Perhaps we institute some harsh terms. No children see grandparents for a while, at least until either the virus stops circling in our community or we have a viable vaccine. Most of us go to work. Yes, some of us who shouldn't die do. But right now there is no guarantee against this anyway.

I expect most everyone will disagree with me. I'm not saying it's a great idea. But good luck corraling a bunch of teenage to twenty somethings. Until you do every time a senior or someone immune compromised walks into a grocery store it's like Russian roulette.